Trial 1430 August 2026Contemporary Neapolitan
Forty-eight hours cold, and what it cost me
Extending the cold proof from 24 to 48 hours opened the crumb and flattened the flavour. Both, from one change.
I extended the cold proof from 24 hours to 48 and changed nothing else. The crumb opened the way I hoped. The flavour went somewhere I did not expect.
| Flour | Caputo Pizzeria · W 270 · 12.5% protein |
|---|---|
| Hydration | 62% |
| Salt | 2.8% of flour |
| Yeast | 0.12% |
| Bulk | 4 h @ 22 °C |
| Cold proof | 48 h @ 4 °C |
| Ball weight | 250 g |
| Oven | 470 °C deck · 490 °C dome |
| Bake | 90 s |
What the extra day did
Fermentation slows almost to a stop at 4 °C while the enzymes keep working. That is where flavour is supposed to be built — not by the yeast, which is nearly dormant, but by the slow breakdown of starch and protein into things that taste of something.
The structure did exactly what the literature says it should. Cell size up noticeably against trial 13, walls visibly thinner, and the rim took the heat without collapsing. What I did not expect was the flavour going flatter rather than deeper — less of the sweetness I get at 24 hours, and a faint sourness that was not there before.
Widths proportional to duration.
The schedule makes the shape of it obvious: almost the entire process is waiting, and the part I actually control is a minute and a half at the end.
Where it went wrong
Next: hold 48 h and drop yeast to 0.09% to see whether the flavour loss tracks fermentation extent or simply elapsed time. If it is elapsed time, the answer is that 24 hours was right all along and I have been chasing crumb structure at the cost of taste.
Figures on this page are placeholder content while the log is being kept properly. They will be replaced with measured values.